Sunday, January 31, 2010

Homeschooling for Five Months...

We started our homeschooling in September. After five months, I will try to tell what we have learned and what we are doing.

Our inspiration and teacher in life is Russell Kirk. We have had other teachers, but just about everything my wife and I learned to love and do together began the year we lived in Mecosta. We knew him in his last days. I worked in his library, sorted his mail, and read his published works and correspondence. He introduced me to Edmund Burke, John Henry Newman, G.K. Chesterton, Christopher Dawson, and T.S. Eliot. Eliot's Notes Towards the Definition of Culture, Dawson's The Crisis of Western Education, and Newman's The Idea of a University are great works scarcely read or understood today. We agree with these authors that the life of the soul is paramount and that utilitarian education is likely to result in what C.S. Lewis called "men without chests." We agree with Dawson: "It is the religious impulse which supplies the cohesive force which unifies a society and a culture.... A society which has lost its religion becomes sooner or later a society which has lost its culture." We agree with Kirk that a good education is less about appropriations and bricks and mortar and more about will and a commitment to teaching Eliot's "Permanent Things."

Though we looked at several books and programs for Catholic and classical homeschooling, we found the Classical Liberal Arts Academy (CLAA) last summer. We read everything we could about it and realized that its founder, William Michael, is fully committed to education in the Trivium and Quadrivium as enlightened by Christ and His Church, and he believes a great education can be administered online. Besides beginning this Classical Liberal Arts Academy in 2008, he assists with Catholic missionary schools through his direct involvement with the Missionaries of the Poor (MOPS) in Kingston, Jamaica.

Our daughter is now enrolled in five courses: Classic Catechism I, Latin Grammar I, Classical Arithmetic I, World Chronology I, and World Geography I. In addition, we have her in several other activities: gymnastics, piano, art, 4H Club, and target shooting (BB guns). She has a very good play group with local kids who are also homeschooled, and she has friends who attend modern schools. She also attends my sacramental prep class (for kids who missed 1st communion class in 2nd grade) as a spectator. (She knows much more than the kids in the class.) We have memberships at museums and attractions in the nearest metropolis.

The CLAA Catechism course covers all four parts of the Catholic catechism: prayers, creeds, commandments, and sacraments. Its common method is to teach one of the prayers or creeds by memory and to explain the origins and theology behind it. So far, she has memorized and studied the Our Father, The Apostles' Creed, The Angelus, The Confiteor, The Act of Contrition, and Prayers at Meals. The lessons are not difficult for my daughter, though they are theologically rich, and she clips through them fairly rapidly.

Latin Grammar has been excellent so far. I know just enough Latin to make a mess out of teaching it. It is a difficult subject for self-study, and I cannot afford a tutor. Even if I found a tutor, the number of people proficient in Latin who can teach effectively is next to nil. If we wait until she is just a few years older than she is, her God-given ability to acquire languages will be significantly diminished. The program is built on memory work. Our daughter has memorized the first twenty-three verses of the Gospel of John from the Vulgate. With some of the prettiest scriptures ever written swimming in her head, she has also memorized dozens of grammar rules and the first three declensions.

If that sounds horrible to you, just recall how when you were younger than twelve, you could memorize anything. For me, it was airplanes, ships, tanks, battles, generals, and dinosaurs. In contrast, by the time I became interested in forestry and botany in junior high school, my ability to memorize had diminished, and to this day my interest in plants remains strong, but my knowledge of them has never advanced as it has in history and other subjects.

The quizzes and exams are taken online, and she has to master a lesson before she can move to the next one. Thus, the inherent problem of public school- passing a student because failure is embarrassing to the student, the parents, and the school- is simply not practiced. It is not allowed. Periodically, the students are required to retake old exams for review.

So after five months, I believe I have found a program through which my daughter can learn the primary language of the West and the Church. We are very excited and wish we could have gotten this good an education ourselves. (My wife and I both attended public schools.) We are especially happy that the primary text for study is the Gospel of John: "In principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat Verbum." Saint Jerome, pray for us.

We are just as pleased with Classical Arithmetic. The approach is Aristotelian: practical in application, yet philosophical in its end. She began with definitions and measures. She moved on to proofs, axioms, numbers, ratios, addition, subtraction, and multiplication. She is learning the commutative, associative, and distributive properties. Though there is plenty of memory work, e.g., the multiplication tables, the focus is on mastery of the principles of reason and their application by analogy. I speak as someone who loves the humanities and did not learn mathematics well as it was taught, so I am sure some of my readers might find this approach wanting, but I know if I had been shown at a young age that mathematics is more than problem sets and busy work (and staying after school) and is the foundation of both higher reasoning and engineering, I might have studied more enthusiastically.

After we had begun Catechism, Grammar, and Arithmetic for about a month, we added the course in World Chronology I. I knew my daughter would love it, because she loves history, or more specifically, she loves a good story. Nonetheless, she loves it, in particular, Greece and Rome. The course begins by introducing four epics: Ancient History, Classical History, Medieval History, and Modern History. The lessons trace the origins of Western civilization in the Hebrews, the Hellenes, and the Romans. She has learned about the life and times of Abraham, Moses, Achilles, Odysseus, David, Solomon, Homer, Romulus, Lucretia, Hosea, Hezekiah, Nebuchadnezzar, Daniel, Cyrus, Ezra, Socrates, Alexander, and the Maccabees. Kirk, author of The Roots of American Order, would appreciate the lessons' sweep and breadth. As a teacher, I appreciate their order and clarity. Continuity, not change, is the predominant theme. Revelation and reason have informed almost everything man-made that we call good. If we sever Athens from Jerusalem or Jerusalem from Athens, we will become poor.

We added World Geography I this month. We knew she would love it, and she does. The course begins with globe skills: the equator, the poles, latitude & longitude, tropics and polar regions. The exercises use Bing Maps to explore the world. I like best its interdisciplinary approach: earth science, geometry, oceanography, meteorology. These are not covered in depth so far, but their foundations are laid. We have enjoyed every day of it.

That is my report. There is no perfect way to educate a child. We have good days and bad days. Sometimes we throw up our hands and take a field trip. I do not hold a person in contempt for disagreeing with my approach and beliefs. After all, nothing reveals one's aspirations and beliefs as does education (except, perhaps, one's funeral).

[Above: John Henry Newman, and Albrecht Durer, Saint Jerome in the Wilderness.]

UPDATE: A Lutheran discusses classical learning and William Michael's Classical Liberal Arts Academy here and here and here.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Biggest attack on the Supreme Court by a President since 1937

Barack Obama is not the only president to try to bully the U.S. Supreme Court. Franklin D. Roosevelet did it famously in 1937. From reading on the web, those who believe the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore is the worst thing since Plessy v. Ferguson believe the Supreme Court had it coming.

I myself just find it bad form. The President is invited each year by the Congress to give the State of the Union Address. The event is held in the House chamber because of its larger size. Every dignitary in town is invited, including the justices of the Supreme Court, though few actually attend.

This year six attended. They sat on the front two rows as invited guests of the Congress and get chewed out by the President on national television. Obama told the world he thought their recent decision on political speech was wrong. (But should the Federal Elections Commission be able to censor the showing of an anti-Hillary Clinton film just before a primary?) House and Senate Democrats stood up and started cheering Obama and taunting the justices. Look at their body language. It reminds me of fans at a basketball game who don't like the referee's call.

Hot Air has a nice comment and the video.

One thing I promise not to do: if I become governor of my state, mayor of my city, or delegate to the Hibernian Society's national convention, I won't stand up and bully a bunch of judges who might need to decide a case in my favor.

One last story: A few years ago in my state the local trial judges asked their county (not my county) for a larger supplement to the state salaries, a common practice here. The county commissioners told them there was not any money in the budget for them. They thought it was over.

But something happened. When given a choice between fines and jail, the local trial judges selected jail. In fact, they went out of their way to prescribe punishments that did not involve fines. Within a few weeks, the county commissioners figured out that they could not afford the expenses of the justice system if the local judges did not issue fines. The county commissioners granted the increase in the local judges supplements.

I predict that the justices will knock President Obama down a peg or two and do it in such a way no one will learn of it.

Saint Thomas More and adoption

Sister Mary Martha has a good post.

The Meaning of Tradition

Nice post by Taylor Marshall.

"A Monk's Heart"


My blogging friend from Brooklyn, Fallen Sparrow, discusses his love of the Benedictines, and compares them to an order he loves but finds less affinity with, the Dominicans.

I love them both. My heart is for teaching, so if pressed I would probably join those mendicant preachers.

Nice photo of the Shenandoah Valley at the link.

"In God's time..."


Nice post by Jordana Adams.

Ralph McInerny (1929-2010), Requiescat in pace.


Hat tip to Jay Anderson.

When I was a new assistant to Russell Kirk in Mecosta and started reading Catholic literature for the first time in my life, Ralph McInerny's Crisis was vital, fresh, and new.

Remember the dead...


U.S. Second Division's shrine to our own in Afghanistan. Michael Yon reports.

"Why They Hate Us: Middle Eastern Politics and the Principle of the Strong Horse"

Michael Totten interviews Lee Smith.

Read the whole thing.

"The Obama Contradiction: Washington is Sick and Broken- And It Can Solve All Our Problems"

Peggy Noonan writes:

'The central fact of the speech was the contradiction at its heart. It repeatedly asserted that Washington is the answer to everything. At the same time it painted a picture of Washington as a sick and broken place. It was a speech that argued against itself: You need us to heal you. Don't trust us, we think of no one but ourselves.

'The people are good but need guidance—from Washington. The middle class is anxious, and its fears can be soothed—by Washington. Washington can "make sure consumers . . . have the information they need to make financial decisions." Washington must "make investments," "create" jobs, increase "production" and "efficiency."

'At the same time Washington is a place "where every day is Election Day," where all is a "perpetual campaign" and the great sport is to "embarrass your opponents" and lob "schoolyard taunts."

'Why would anyone have faith in that thing to help anyone do anything?'

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

"Evangelical Is Not Enough"



An evangelical Protestant named Elizabeth Esther is hosting a book discussion on Dr. Thomas Howard's book.

Here it is.

Rene Descartes fell short...

Fr. Dwight Longenecker discusses how we know we exist:

'When my nephew Michael was getting ready for college he told me he was expected to write a paper in his first week entitled, “How do I know I exist?” After discussing the matter for some time he concluded that the best thing to do was to punch his professor in the nose. The resulting pain when the professor punched back would thereby prove that both of them existed.'

Read on.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Darwinism seems to play out in politics.

Peggy Noonan discusses the current battle of survival of the unfittest:

'Speaking broadly: In the 2006 and 2008 elections, and at some point during the past decade, the ancestral war between Democrats and the Republicans began to take on a new look. If you were a normal human sitting at home having a beer and watching national politics peripherally, as normal people do until they focus on an election, chances are pretty good you came to see the two major parties not as the Dems versus the Reps, or the blue versus the red, but as the Nuts versus the Creeps. The Nuts were for high spending and taxing and the expansion of government no matter what. The Creeps were hypocrites who talked one thing and did another, who went along on the spending spree while lecturing on fiscal solvency.

'In 2008, the voters went for Mr. Obama thinking he was not a Nut but a cool and sober moderate of the center-left sort. In 2009 and 2010, they looked at his general governing attitudes as reflected in his preoccupations—health care, cap and trade—and their hidden, potential and obvious costs, and thought, "Uh-oh, he's a Nut!"

'Which meant they were left with the Creeps.

'But the Republican candidates in Virginia and New Jersey, and now Scott Brown in Massachusetts, did something amazing. They played the part of the Creep very badly! They put themselves forward as serious about spending, as independent, not narrowly partisan. Mr. Brown rarely mentioned he was a Republican, and didn't even mention the party in his victory speech. Importantly, their concerns were on the same page as the voters'. They focused on the relationship between spending and taxing, worried about debt and deficits, were moderate in their approach to social issues.'

Gridlock is how America can survive this petty battle between Nuts and Creeps as funded by crony capitalists of both parties. Gridlock, as I've said before, is good. Like purgatory, I not only believe in gridlock, I'm counting on it.

"As the Flame of Catholic Dissent Dies Out"

Nice piece, though Catholic dissent will never die out. Fortunately, Catholic dissent cannot breed itself because dissenting Catholics tend to use contraception.

"Who Should (And Shouldn’t) Go to Law School"

Sarah Waldeck answers:

'Only go to law school next year if (1) you have always dreamed of being a lawyer; or (2) you are accepted by a very prestigious institution; or (3) you are offered a full scholarship.'

I must agree. Yes, I have a law degree and practice law. Yes, I make a better living than many people (but not a third as much money as some people presume). Nonetheless, as Megan McArdle said this month, "Cheap money makes us stupid." I went to law school on cheap money, borrowed my way through the birth of a child and the purchase of a house, and managed to stay solvent (so far). Would I try it now the same way? No, nein, nyet.

We are witnessing the death of many business plans. If you finish a law degree in the next five years, you are two or three times more likely to be setting up your own shingle or becoming a journeyman in a specialized practice than I was. Associates' salaries are frozen or falling right now.

If you have the guts to be a "lawyer's lawyer," there is room for you at the trial bar because the number of pretenders is large. But don't become a lawyer because you are too scared to be an entrepreneur. You are likely to be forced by circumstances to become an entrepreneurial lawyer.

More horrors of the atomic bomb...

Tsutomu Yamaguchi survived the atomic bomb detonation over Hiroshima... and went to Nagasaki. The book review linked is of The Last Train from Hiroshima by Charles Pellegrino.

Whittaker Chambers & Lionel Trilling

A dual biography by Michael Kimmage.

The writer is to my left, but the period and the two characters are more than interesting.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

He doesn't feel your pain...

Our last Democratic president felt everyone's pain. I am not sure this president feels any pain. Barack Obama might be a Vulcan.

John B. Judis writes in The New Republic:

'Obama’s political problem boils down to the difficulty he has speaking to and for middle America. This problem became evident during the middle of the primary battle with Hillary Clinton. And it could have seriously damaged his candidacy against John McCain. But the onset of the financial crisis that fall, and McCain’s feeble response to it, along with his choice of Sarah Palin as vice president, highlighted Obama’s strongest asset in the eyes of voters--his intelligence--and reduced the importance of his lack of a common touch.

'As president, however, Obama’s lack of engagement with middle America has come to the surface and has contributed to his decline in popularity. This shortcoming has been evident in his style and choice of venues--he gave his endorsement of Coakley on Sunday at Northeastern University, in Boston, rather than at a union hall or public auditorium in Worcester or Springfield.'


He didn't get to be president by being dumb, but he is going to have to develop some communication skills he has not yet shown. After all the swooning about him, he has to prove that he can govern, not just preach to the choir.

Taylor Marsh, like many at the Huffington Post and other progressive sites, believes that Obama could have led a progressive surge and permanent majority if he had not compromised with Republicans or blue dogs.

Dream on. Can you think of a single president who actually governed from the left? FDR and LBJ were bargainers and compromisers between the far left and the Establishment. They were left of center but not leftists. They earned the respect of their opponents, and they were feared because they could persuade swing voters, not just in the Congress, but on Main Street. It so happens that the left had credibility- even a sense of inevitability- in those days.

The left is just another faction today. It has no moral heft outside its own narrow circles. The left that scared liberals and conservatives into social reforms for a century crumbled on international television twice in 1989: at Tiananmen Square and at the Brandenburg Gate. Everyone without blinders now knows that Obama, though moderate of temperament and without populist passion, is a creature of the progressive left, elitist branch. There is no mass movement, only the faculty lounge, NGOs, Hollywood, Big Media, and non-profits.

His home is Hyde Park by way of Hawaii, not Birmingham or Detroit. He might be the anti-John Adams, the man from nowhere, unlike Adams, who was a New Englander through and through despite his travels and education.

Obama, like most everyone of the left, doe not really understand the middle class. I cannot speak for him, but many of his supporters simply despise the middle class, a position that might get you tenured but not reelected.

One blogger notes:

'It’s clear that the middle class is the great enemy of collectivism. Only they have the combination of voting power, money, and economic self-interest to see the growth of government as undesirable, and provide effective resistance. They generally view their interactions with government in a negative light – they’ve all spent time in the Department of Motor Vehicles mausoleum, spent hours wrestling with tax forms, or been slapped with a traffic citation they don’t think they deserved. They understand the inefficiency and emotional instability of government, and instinctively resent its intrusion into their lives. A health-care takeover is the best chance collectivists will ever have of persuading the middle class to vote itself into chains… but for the better part of a century, they’ve been able to hear the hammers of the State ringing on the metal of those chains, in the forges of taxation and regulation.'

Does anyone outside of progressive circles believe Obama can govern despite, in spite, and to spite the middle class?



Who is looking better as the days go by?

Bill Ayres' wife Bernardine Dohrn and Hamas

Caroline Glick discusses how the unrepentant far left has no moral judgment whatsoever.

The latest from Anne Rice

JWR has a nice piece about her.

Perhaps some of you know she is a Catholic revert. I never read her fiction, only her story of her spiritual reversion to the Old Church.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Massachusetts!


I lived in Massachusetts about midway through Ted Kennedy's Senate career. Yes, Sen. Kennedy represented a liberal state. Yes, he had the Kennedy name and Irish charm. Yes, he ran for Senate in 1964, 1970, 1976, and 1982, which were years of Democratic surges, as well as 1988, Michael Dukakis' year as a favorite son. Nonetheless, he survived the Republican surge in 1994 as well as every Republican, strong and weak, who ran against him over five decades. He knew how to take care of constituents. He knew how to play the political game.

Tonight's result in the Senate race, besides being about the things under public discussion, is also a gigantic release of pent-up frustration and energy. You'd think that everybody in the Bay State loved Ted Kennedy, but it simply was not true. He was the best politician in the state, and he won no matter what, but he was not beloved by all. He had more baggage than Bill Clinton. Many Bay Staters despised him and used the same words to describe him as might be said in my hometown.

Today everyone who ever wanted to beat Ted Kennedy (or any Kennedy) went to the polls to put somebody in office who could not be confused for a Kennedy or a Kennedy proxy. They were fortunate that the Democratic candidate had no charm. The Bay State is not going to turn into South Carolina; in fact, Scott Brown will have to be a whale of a Senator to get reelected in 2012. It is a great victory just the same.

I am happy, and as one who rooted for Ray Shamie to beat Ted Kennedy in 1982, I must say it's great to have a Republican Senator from Massachusetts. May he start a dynasty like that of Henry Cabot Lodge.

[Portrait above of Daniel Webster, the Bay State's greatest Senator.]

UPDATE: Because Scott Brown is not a Catholic, even if he is socially libertarian, he won't embarrass us papists the way Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd, John Kerry, and Nancy Pelosi have done.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Walker Percy and John Updike


As Fr. Dwight Longenecker discusses Percy's character Binx Bolling:

'He's on 'the search' and he says, "To become aware of the possibility of the search is to be on to something. Not to be on to something is to be in despair."'

Saturday, January 16, 2010

"Let's Press Bess"

Fr. Dwight Longenecker reflects on the Elizabethan era.

The Obama Disconnect

Peggy Noonan's latest column, an excerpt:

'Politics is about policy. It's not about who's emotional and who cries or makes you cry. It's not about big political parties and the victories they need in order to rule. It's not about going on some ideological toot, which is what the health-care bill is, hoping the people will someday see and appreciate your higher wisdom.'

We need good government right now on all levels. Sometimes we can live without it. Sadly, elected officials of both parties lack the seriousness necessary to wage wars, to address public problems, and to quit threatening our future by borrowing to finance government speculation in the economy and crony capitalism.

The healthcare bill is Exhibit 1A: it is an attempt by Democrats to construct a coalition of special interests to out-muscle Republican special interests and thereby make an entire industry beholden to the Democrats for a generation. A better bill could have been drafted that would create more market choices in healthcare, tax certain types of benefits in order to support better care for the needy, make sure that those who provide good services, i.e., doctors and nurses rather than middlemen, are well paid, and allocate most catestrophic risk through private insurance rather than government fiat.

It would be better now to abandon the bill, get serious about government waste, lay off government employees who are not essential (as state and local governments are actually doing), purge the Department of Homeland Security as well as the intelligence agencies of their dumbest staff, and give every taxpayer shares of any company the federal government has taken over, e.g., General Motors.

The progressive agenda of top-heavy healthcare, cap and trade, and financial institutions utterly beholden to Uncle Sam (if I may reveal a not-so-secret secret) is not a populist agenda or even a popular agenda. I never believed the current president would transform America by the wave of his magic electoral wand, but I wish he rise above his advisors and the U.S. Congress.

UPDATE: Unemployment now is abominable, and small business is the only solution. If the Democrats want to remain in power, they must recognize that jobs are not created by the government or huge corporations. Small business owners, people with little or no overhead who can do "shareholder relations" by calling their relatives, are the ones who create jobs. They will do so as soon as they are no longer scared that our holier-than-thou Congress is not going to collect confiscatory taxes, drive up their overhead through increased healthcare costs, and regulate them into insolvency. Spengler has a nice piece on unemployment here.

Ad hominem attacks by politicians against pollsters

Pat Caddell, a man I respect very much who was Jimmy Carter's chief pollster, notes that any pollster today who publishes bad news about an elected official or legislative program is called a tool for the bad guys.

Scott Rasmussen is the target at the moment.

"Truths We Dare Not Speak"

Victor Davis Hanson is right again:

'We are tired of Iraq and have Trotskyized it out of our existence, given the huge cost and 4,000 dead.

'But consider: not a single America died in Iraq in December (38 murdered in Chicago during that period); three have been lost this month (24 murdered so far this month in Chicago).

'Some random thoughts. The surge was a brilliant success.

'The heroes are relatively ignored. They are U.S. forces who served in Iraq, of course; Gens. Odierno and Petraeus (recall what he endured from Hillary Clinton and MoveOn.org in his Senate inquisition); civilian analysts like Fred Kagan and retired Gen. Keane; and, of course, a demonized George Bush—attacked by most of his former supporters, the majority of pundits and columnists, those Democrats who had voted to authorize the war, many of the Iraq Study Group members; and by a cadre of retired “revolt of the generals” officers.

'Yet for some reason, very few senators (cf. the You Tube videos of the debates of October 11-12, 2002) who gave impassioned pleas, authorizing 23 writs to go to war, have ever quite explained why they flipped—and what they think now of both their original support, and their subsequent opposition.

'A Harry Reid (“the war is lost”) or Barack Obama (out of Iraq by March 2008 and the surge “is not working”) have never subsequently suggested that they were wrong at a time when our troops desperately were trying against all odds to save the fragile country.'



I don't trust people to "reform" my country, even if it needs reforming, if their judgment about our most important military commitment of the decade was totally and completely wrong.

Two sides of the English-speaking pond...

Geoff Dyer writes in the NYT about Americans and Brits:

'Like many Europeans, I always feel good about myself in America; I feel appreciated, liked. It took a while to realize that this had nothing to do with me. It was about the people who made me feel this way: it was about charm. Yes, this is the bright secret of life in the United States: Americans are not just friendly and polite — they are also charming. And the most charming thing of all is that it rarely looks like charm.'

Still divided by a common language.

God bless the U.S. Navy!


The U.S.S. Carl Vinson was not built as an disaster aid ship, but being a mobile airport powered by nuclear fission and equipped with hospitals and a couple of companies of Marines cannot hurt when there is death and anarchy. Mona Charon writes a nice piece here. The "Gold Eagle" is on its way to Haiti.

But there is more than hardware aboard. More than 5,000 sailors are part of a tradition second to none, even if the Navy has become "kinder and gentler" through the years. (Click on the link for the report of a sailor who signed up in about 1960. I doubt he shops at Old Navy. Hat tip to Glenn Reynolds.)

“Haiti is the broken bloody body of Christ”


The video clip of Archbishop Timothy Dolan is more than moving.

Hat tip to the Anchoress.

Report from a missionary in Haiti

Linked by the Anchoress.

"Haiti Earthquake Caused by Witchcraft?"

Fr. Dwight Longenecker discusses a complex country with a sad history.

Saint Peter Claver, pray for us.

UPDATE: Nice piece on the religious culture of Haiti and what earthquakes can do for apocalyptic religions. Hat tip to the Anchoress.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

"A Grand Little Chapel"

Within the Big Church. Pope Benedict's Anglican initiative will bear much fruit.

I am not talking about numbers. The Church's successes defy the standards of news cycles.

Saint Nicholas Owen


Meet the little carpenter who built hiding places for clandestine Catholic priests in Elizabethan England. Fr. Dwight Longenecker has a nice post about this link. As you might guess, Saint Nicholas died on the rack.

Saturday, January 09, 2010

"Descent into Hell, the Internet, and the Prison of Self"

Maclin Horton links to Lydia McGrew.

My wife and I like the novels of Charles Williams, which were introduced to me through Thomas Howard's course on Modern Myth.

More about football 2009-10

Jay Anderson discusses the "NASCARization of college football" and makes predictions for 2010.

What should be the role of torture in defending freedom?

Kyle Cupp argues that the use of torture will make us a nation of Gollums.

Problems in the law school "business plan"


One of the signs of the fact that I am not a financial genius is that I borrowed very large sums to finance my way through a well-regarded private law school. Though stifled somewhat by my debt, I cannot say that my investment has been a failure: I am a practicing attorney who pays his bills, and I am doing some good for the world.

This business plan itself, not unlike the risky financing that allowed mortgage lenders and underwriters to essentially print money for fifteen years, is being questioned, if it is not already in trouble.

But law schools will be the last to abandon speculative debt as the means of financing themselves through their willing applicants, because a very large number of applicants are smarty-pants who couldn't make it as scientists, engineers, bankers, financiers, etc. The applicant doesn't realize how speculative his investment is until he is one to four years in.

Mark in Spokane has an interesting post here.

UPDATE: Megan McArdle says: 'The best explanation for the calamity that has overtaken us may simply be that cheap money makes us all stupid.'

Ray Bradbury and modern times...

Nice post by Karen Edmisten:

'Bradbury didn't have to look very far to see people who didn't understand why poetry made them cry, who thought that children were "ruinous" and that politicians should be elected based on good looks and height. He didn't have to stretch the imagination too far to predict relentless escapism consuming a culture.'

We didn't celebrate Epiphany as well as we should...


We do a pretty good job of celebrating twelve days of Christmas, but we need to make Epiphany a family day of cooking, sharing, and play.

[Photo of King's Bread by Jordana Adams.]

More about Epiphany here from Enbrethiliel.

The love of books...

Pentimento sorts through hers.

Wile E. Coyote and American elites...


He never tires and never questions his motives, virtue, or methods. The consensus of "experts"- so long as they went to the "right" schools- suffices to create certainty for him. He is a "genius," yet everyone knows that his schemes never work. Everyone knows that "Acme" products (perhaps built by the federal government) will backfire.

If we follow our elites, the worst set of elites we have had since World War I, our fate might be akin to this entertaining video. Don't say we have not been warned, by Warner Brothers no less.


UPDATE:
'"Conventional wisdom" is, by definition, nothing more than institutionalized intellectual laziness.' Hat tip to Jay Anderson.

"The Risks of Catestrophic Victory: Obama is in the Midst of One. Can the GOP Avert One of Their Own?"

Peggy Noonan notes that passage of the healthcare bill might be a Pyrrhic victory for the Democrats. The bill, either the Senate or House version, is so bad that it could cripple the Democrats for at least one election.

But does anyone trust the Republican leadership to do better if they win in 2010? If the Republicans took back the House and the Senate, would they improve our situation or simply give Barack Obama something to run against in 2012 and make him look more presidential?

Slim Democratic majorities after 2010 would restore the domestic gridlock needed to kill the Progressive agenda yet force the Democrats to face the Islamic fascists and quit pretending we are simply in a turf battle at the university instead of an existential war.

Friday, January 08, 2010

My decade in sports...


Alabama goes undefeated and beats Texas 37-21 for 2009 national championship. More about the Crimson Tide's victory here.

But the decade was better than just one championship: The Boston Celtics beat the Los Angeles Lakers in the NBA finals of 2008. The Boston Red Sox beat the Curse of the Bambino and won the World Series in 2004 and again in 2007.

Tonight, however, the story is football. Alabama has finally beaten the Texas Longhorns, and great Alabama players such as Joe Namath and Terry Davis can feel a bit vindicated.

[Photo of Heisman Trophy winner Mark Ingram scoring a 4th-quarter touchdown to ice the victory over Texas.]

Thursday, January 07, 2010

"An Interview With Christopher Hitchens, Part I"

I freely criticize Christopher Hitchens when he deserves it, but he is a fascinating person, despite his cynicism about religious faith. Something tells me he might have some sort of life experience that embittered him from ever trusting anyone speaking of divine intervention and salvation. Saint Maximilian Kolbe, pray for us.

Hitchens loves freedom, and he is one of the few men of the left who sees Jihadism for what it is: Islamic fascism.

Michael Totten interviews Hitchens here. It is worth the reading, as is almost anything Totten posts.

"Stillbirth of a Progressive Era"

Harold Meyerson laments how the progressive politics promoted by the current administration and Congress are not supported by a grass-roots progressive movement.

Of course, he misses out on the fact that the Progressive Movement in its best days before the Great War was an elitist movement of those who wished to consolidate central power in order under the "right people" to blunt populist and socialist movements of the "wrong people."

Wednesday, January 06, 2010

Lessons from Winston Churchill

Tony Blankley discusses two books: Munich, 1938 by David Faber, and Churchill by Paul Johnson.

Blankley notes regarding Munich, 1938:

'Beyond the obvious policy point that appeasement is generally bad, the value of the book is in its dissection of how the experienced leadership class of the then-leading power — the British Empire — was able to think, talk and deceive itself to a catastrophically bad policy decision.'

"Our Incompetent Civilization: Sometimes We Have to Choose Between Evils".

Bret Stephens has a good piece in the WSJ.

He says:

'Our deeper incompetence stems from an inability to recognize the proper limits to our own virtues; to forget, as Aristotle cautioned, that even good things "bring harm to many people; for before now men have been undone by reason of their wealth, and others by reason of their courage."

'Thus we reject profiling on the commendable grounds that human beings ought not to be treated as statistical probabilities. But at some point, the failure to profile puts innocent lives recklessly at risk. We also abhor waterboarding for the eminently decent reason that it borders on torture. But there are worse things than waterboarding—like allowing another 9/11 to unfold because we recoil at the means necessary to prevent it. Similarly, there are worse things than Guantanamo—like releasing terrorists to Yemen so they can murder and maim again (and so we can hope to take them out for good in a "clean" Predator missile strike).

'Put simply, we do not acquit ourselves morally by trying to abstain from a choice of evils. We just allow the nearest evil to make the choice for us.'

"Why America is Losing the Intelligence War"

Repost of a great 2003 piece by Spengler.

He says:

'During the 1990s, the CIA under Admiral James Woolsey and then under George Tenet cast its net wide for speakers of foreign languages, particularly Middle Eastern and South Asian dialects, with disappointing results. The pool of qualified applicants was too small, and within this pool, too few applicants met the agency’s security standards. Particularly in the case of Arabic and Persian, too many of the candidates were first and second generation immigrants who failed the screening criteria, that is, they were deemed too likely to sympathize with their subjects. The Guantanamo allegations suggest that the CIA’s security concerns were not ill placed.

'By contrast, Israeli intelligence can draw on a pool of first and second generation immigrants who speak foreign languages (among which Arabic is most common) as natives, but feel no loyalty whatever, but rather hostility, to their native culture. During the Cold War, European intelligence services could find native speakers of all varieties – German-speaking Bohemians from the Austrian Empire, Polish-speaking Ukrainians, Russian-speaking Poles, Italian-speaking Austrians – who despised the cultures in which they were educated and were happy to subvert them. The average Hungarian headwaiter had a greater command of languages than today’s doctoral students in comparative literature at American universities.'


He adds his solution to Afghanistan:

'Get someone else to do the dirty work who understands how to fight tribal war. In my year-end “Spengler” column at Asia Times I recommended inviting the Indians in. That is more complicated than it sounds, but nonetheless possible.'

If you click on the last link, "Life and Premature Death of Pax Obamicana," Spengler compares China to Austria in 1914 and Pakistan to the Balkans.

Has much has Europe lost its willingness to fight for freedom?

Bruce Bawer writes:

'Hege [Storhaug] suggested that if all the influential newspapers in Europe had published the Danish cartoons, “it would have been much more difficult to build up the increasingly brutal climate we see now all over Europe: the fact that people are not just the subjects of attacks, and of attempted murder, but are denied virtually all personal freedom in their daily lives, so that [Kurt] Westergaard [Danish cartoonist] cannot set foot outside his home without the police on his heels, just as Robert Redeker is living underground in the homeland of Voltaire.” And she asked: “Will Europe manage to set its foot down strongly enough . . . that there will be no doubt that the continent never will give up its founding values? Or will the commentariat and political elite continue to give way, inch by inch . . . ?”

Michael Yon gets arrested at a U.S. airport for refusing to say how much money he makes...

I'm not making this up.

I agree with Stephen Bainbridge that I'm not getting on a commercial flight except for a family emergency.

Astronomy for children...

All kids like the night sky. Freeman Hunt links to several sources.

Tonight the moon is not out yet. My daughter and I walked to the cemetery with a dog (not useful for astronomy) and a pair of binoculars (useful). It's a good night to view Orion and Sirius.

Hat tip: Glenn Reynolds.

Monday, January 04, 2010

My best post of 2009...


Glenn Reynolds discusses the recycling by bloggers of what they consider their best posts of the year.

My best posts, at least in my opinion, do not always ring a bell with my readers. I worked very hard on this post on the passing of Robert S. McNamara.

I wrote it for my father, whose criticisms of McNamara shaped my understanding of many things. He liked it, and that's all that matters.

Keep your eye on the ball...

Peggy Noonan's thoughts on the decade and the new year.

Moral bankruptcy often leads to financial insolvency...

Materialists would like you to think it's the other way around. Michael Barone notes:

'Private-sector employment rose 2.4 million in 1982-90, 2.1 million in 1991-2001 and only 1 million in 2001-07. America had fewer private-sector jobs on Dec. 31, 2009, than on Dec. 31, 1999.

'Economists are not entirely sure why. Increasing manufacturing productivity and foreign competition have played a role. But another factor may be at work — what tech entrepreneur Jim Manzi identifies in an article in National Affairs as "the growing disparity in behavioral norms and social conditions between the upper and lower income strata in American society."

'America, his argument goes, is failing to develop the human capital it needs, at least in what we might call the underhalf of our society.

'Manzi notes that the behavioral revolution of the 1960s and 1970s produced hugely higher divorce and out-of-wedlock childbirth rates. Then, in the past two decades, the rates of divorce and unmarried parenthood have fallen back to 1950s levels among college graduates. But they have remained high, or even increased, among non-college graduates, which we may take as a reasonable proxy for the underhalf.


'It's clear that there's a high correlation between lifestyle patterns and economic performance. Almost no one who graduates from high school, gets married and stays married, and gets a job falls into poverty. Many who do not do these things do.'


I don't need to test my luck, but guys like me who come from relatively stable families and have expectations of professional success can often afford to make a few stupid mistakes. Most of America, however, cannot afford to copulate as foolishly as their favorite singers and movie stars. The Victorians might have been hypocrites in many cases, but they did not pretend that children of the working classes would have more than two nickels to put together even if they lived as irresponsibly as some of their "betters."

Barbara Dafoe Whitehead was blasted in 1993 when she published a piece in The Atlantic called "Dan Quayle Was Right."

If you look at the piece, it is hard to find her wrong about anything substantial.

Post No. 2900- Thomas Fleming looks back at Prohibition

Prohibition exemplifies what happens when a social reform movement takes a life of its own and defies common sense and human experience.

A moderate agenda...

Ross Douthat writes in the NYT:

'[Jim]Manzi’s National Affairs essay, a tour d’horizon of our socioeconomic situation, provides a solid place to start. He proposes a fourfold agenda: Unwind the partnerships forged between Big Business and Big Government in the wake of the 2008 crash; seek financial regulations that “contain busts,” by segregating high-risk transactions from lower-risk enterprises; deregulate the public school system, to let a thousand charter schools and start-ups bloom; and shift our immigration policy away from low-skilled immigration, and toward the recruitment of high-skilled émigrés from around the globe.

'To this list, I would add tax reform and entitlement reform.'



I don't think he is completely right, but it is nice to see someone who understands that crony capitalism, whether by Democrats or Republicans, is one of the great threats to our liberties and our prosperity.

Mainstream media are finally getting tough on Obama's foreign policy

The LA Times publishes this by Robert J. Lieber:

'Obama overestimates the extent to which America's adversaries determine their policies in reaction to U.S. rhetoric and policy rather than as expressions of their own values, history and interests. Emphasis on interdependence, good intentions and the belief that "the interests of nations and peoples are shared" does not go very far in explaining the motivations of Vladimir Putin, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Bashar Assad or Hugo Chavez. The message conveyed is that if only he could assure adversaries or allies that he -- and thus America -- means well, threats or problems could be mitigated or overcome altogether.'

I will be cynical here and note that if Barack Obama fails in a Carteresque way, the mainstream media will suffer the loss of most of the credibility they still have. Thus, the mainstream media have a strong interest now in distancing themselves from him. This is good. Perhaps they will do what they are supposed to do.

Do we have the candor to call the hot undies bomber a "jihadist?"

Not yet notes Charles Krauthammer.

But, as painful and dangerous as it is, the Democratic Party is having to take responsibility for facing down existential threats. The Christmas undie bomber scared the hell out of millions of Americans and government officials. Perhaps some good might come out of it.

Should we imitate the Israelis in our airport security?

They don't merely pretend to watch for terrorists. They don't look at homeland security as a jobs program. They use trained people to keep their eyes open and ask lots of questions.

Sunday, January 03, 2010

New Year's Day in Nashville...


NYE dinner at Sperry's,
Mass on NYD at Saint Phillip's in Franklin,
NYD dinner at my cousin's house,
January 2 riding around the West End seeing places we once knew well,
a visit to Elder's Bookstore,
Vigil Mass for the Feast of the Epiphany at Christ the King Church on Belmont Boulevard.

We love the city of Nashville.